Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daemon (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 06:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daemon (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage per WP:NF. This is only sourced to IMDb. SL93 (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I found a review and a lengthy mention in a book. I also found evidence of reviews (or at least some commentary) in these books: [1], [2] (this one is McFarland), [3]. I can't look into them, but the preview that came up in the search field gave off the impression that they were lengthier than just a routine listing in a database-esque book. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as reliable sources references with significant coverage have been identified above so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is no longer necessary imv, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:40, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 03:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to meet the notability threshold as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article has been provided with sources that show the topic passes the GNG. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 15:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.